valkyrieandstrangeridingaragorn:
dracosollicitus:
I’ve been having a very specific Bucky Barnes Thought™ the last few days.
How has the Disney Plus TV branch of the MCU written themselves into an ethical corner wherein:
- the brainwashed, tortured prisoner of war spends almost his entire narrative arc in his show (The Falcon and the Winter Soldier) struggling to atone for the crimes he committed when he wasn’t in control of his mind and body, and not spend a lot of time, y'know, actively healing (minus the famous Ayo scene)
- the same tortured POW struggles with autonomy, PTSD, and constant guilt, and isn’t really comforted by anyone on that specific front, despite them having great opportunities to assert that he isn’t in any way responsible for what he did, and that while it’s great that he wants to do good, he’s a victim of Hydra’s violence as well and doesn’t need to continue doing their work by torturing himself with anger and self-hatred
- BUT, in a subsequent show, an assassin who willingly murdered who-knows-how-many people gets to have a frolicking good time at Christmas as he attempts to hide his past work as an assassin who willingly murdered who-knows-how-many people
- his main concerns are: upholding the promise he made to his children to be home for fun Christmas traditions; mourning the death of his supposed best friend a bare handful of times in cheapened ways that feel more guilt-based than grief-based (don’t think I’m faulting Jeremy Renner here - this is more of a quibble with the script); and so far, apparently wanting to reclaim the Ronin costume to hide his culpability in the whole “murdered probably dozens of people extra-judiciously because I consciously convinced myself that it was my job to murder people when I was sad, and it was OK because they were baddies that I deemed bad enough” thing.
Every time I think about it, I’m left with the same conclusion where Disney wants us to accept that a victim is someone who should feel guilt for what’s been done to them and for what they’ve done as a result; and a hero is someone who does terrible and violent things because they are convinced they’re right, and that extrajudicial murder is good and just when you are a hero, a fun circular piece of logic.
Sure, there’s three more episodes of Hawkeye, so we’ll see if they fix this bizarre ethics system the MCU has constructed, but it’s not like the problem began with this show or TFATWS.
I have only seen the first two episodes of Hawkeye (and I’m not a fan) but what they said in ep1 during the auction left me speechless: “Ronin decimated the criminal underworld of the city, almost completely annihilating the status and power of the head of organized crime. The Ronin brought a brutal form of justice to his victims”.
Justice? Don’t make me laugh. It’s so clear the MCU never judges the action but who is doing it and depending on who it is they say it’s right or wrong.
Bucky has to make amends but Ronin was bringing justice to the victims? What kind of joke is that?!
Oh nooo they romanticised his time as Ronin? 🤦♀️🤦♀️
Where’s the social justice crowd calling out the cultural appropriation that is the “Ronin” title?? Look, I know this title exists in the comics and went through a number of different characters, but let’s not pretend it’s not cultural appropriation by taking an exotic-sounding Japanese word, bastardising the significance of it, and giving it to a series of non-Asian heroes.
According to Wiki, the first Ronin was introduced in 2005. Rurouni Kenshin, arguably one of the most popular manga that romanticised the concept of “ronin” had its run from 1994 to 1999. It was amongst the few manga that was popular enough to have a decent fanbase outside of Japan even before English manga publishers became a thing, and I would be very surprised if the creators of “Ronin” didn’t draw their inspiration from this manga.
“Ronin” is a term that is inseparable from the feudal Japan culture and strict social hierarchy that created it, and people made into “ronin” were socially ostracised and lived in impoverished conditions (eg for some time they weren’t allowed to live in cities). Rurouni Kenshin is a story that lamented the rapid social change that came through because of western countries including America invading and forcing Japan to open up. The Bakumatsu Era was a time of great turmoil, loss and uncertainty for Japan, where it has had to collectively rethink its cultural identity and force through changes not many people were ready for.
Regardless of whether “Ronin” drew its inspiration from Rurouni Kenshin, a manga about Japan dealing with forced westernisation, or from the historical meaning of an oppressed class, it’s tasteless for it to be romanticised to become a byword for vigilante samurai-wannabe ninja assassins.
If anyone has ever whinged about non-Japanese people wearing a yukata or kimono (something that Japanese people consider positive in most situations), you better be criticising the use of this word by a White man who took it upon himself to teach Japan how to manage their criminals.